Let's face facts here, folks: "Twilight" is not very good, but at this point, if you want to keep your fingers on the pulse of the pop culture community, familiarity with it is almost a requirement. That's why we've taken it upon ourselves to combine the first installment of the Twilight saga with the one thing that might almost get it to make sense: heavy drinking! Just pour a glass of your favorite adult beverage and read along, but be warned: If you actually do this, you will probably die, and you will definitely remember less about the book when it's over than when you started.

Take a drink whenever...
- Edward is described as one of the following: Pale, pallid, white, alabaster, ivory, faint, literally sparkling, like a thousand diamonds, incandescent, smooth, statuesque, glittering, scintillating, lavender, perfect, satin smooth, cool as stone.
Take two drinks when...
- He is three or more of these things in the same paragraph.
Take three drinks when...
- The word "butterscotch" is involved.
Finish Your Glass ...
- when he's compared to Batman.
Take a drink whenever...
- Stephenie Meyer offers a glowing, over-the-top description of how smart Bella is (i.e., having read every single book in the library by the age of 16) despite the fact that she's roughly as dumb as a bag of hammers in the actual story.
- Bella does something that sets feminism back by a decade, including (but not limited to) claiming she's too weak and clumsy to bother trying to fight off rapists, asking permission to think, apologizing for getting attacked by a vampire, and slipping immediately into blind obedience when a guy she's been on .5 dates with orders her to do things she doesn't particularly want to do.
Bella's got a great future ahead of her at the Nuremberg war crimes trials.
- Meyer references another work of literature like "Romeo & Juliet" or "Wuthering Heights" so you'll understand the subtlety she's trying to craft when she has characters actually say things like "I am dangerous for you to love!"
- You see the word "chagrin."
- You see the word "dazzle."
No one has used the word "dazzle" this much since Chris Claremont set the record in the spring of '80.
- The book goes out of its way to avoid showing anything resembling action that would advance the plot, to the point where there's a fight between good vampires and evil vampires going on, but the narrative follows Bella as she mopes around a hotel room three states away.
TAKE TWO DRINKS WHEN...
- Bella is rendered unconscious at the climax of the novel, meaning that she gets the life-changing events related to her later in the ultimate violation of the "show, don't tell" rule.
- A character displays great affection for Bella despite the fact that she spends most of her time yelling at her dad like she's angling for a spot on Maury's next "My Kid Is Out Of Control!" special and doing absolutely nothing to engender positive feelings in anyone (least of all the reader).
- Bella ridicules her parents for being concerned about her well-being.
- You wish the book starred the diabolical Biz Markie instead of Bella Swan:

"I asked her her name, she said blah blah blah... for 498 pages."
- Meyer keeps herself from identifying characters by race, but still manages to work in stereotypes by having them speak like the jive-talking passengers from "Airplane."
- Meyer uses a phrase that sounds like a hilariously awkward sex metaphor, i.e.: "As I passed, he suddenly went rigid in his seat" or "It was very hard, in the morning."
- Meyer misuses the word "literally," as in "Forks was literally my personal Hell on Earth."
- The line "It's twilight" actually appears in the novel.

"This party was... great, Gatsby." "I don't know, Jules, it's like something out of a... pulp fiction."
TAKE THREE DRINKS WHEN...
- Meyer brings it back a second time for all the slow kids in the audience.
- Meyer spends the majority of a chapter recapping the previous chapter like a fifth-grader trying to meet the length requirement for a book report.
- Edward brags about how strong and dangerous he is, rather than doing anything that would be considered even remotely strong or dangerous.
- Edward sets off one of the Abusive Relationship Warning Signs, including...
-Does your partner check-up on you by calling, driving by, or getting someone else to?
-Does your partner blame you for his problems or his bad mood?
-Does your partner drive dangerously, or do other things to scare you?
-Have you lost friends or no longer see some of your family because of your partner?
-Are you afraid of your partner or afraid to break up?
FINISH YOUR GLASS when:
- He does five of the above in one chapter.
- You finish a chapter that does absolutely nothing to advance the plot.
- The driving conflict of the book finally arrives after 350 pages.
- You hit a chapter that reads like it was lifted verbatim from LiveJournal.

Current Mood: D:
- When you hit the one part of the book that's actually not bad (Page 414, paragraph 3 of the MMPB edition)
- When the vampires do something that actually sounds exciting, and Bella acts like something other than a cardboard cutout whose only emotions are petulance and co-dependence.
Nah, just kiddin' about that last one. It never happens. The rest of them, however... well, you may want to apologize to your liver before you get started.
Network: 
































Comments:
(135)Add a comment
Wednesday 17 March
By Jet Jaguar
Wait, Bella read almost every book in the library, if she had kept it up she could have been like Squire!
Reply
Monday 31 May
By montana
must've been a small library... twelve goosebump books and a children's dictionary
Wednesday 17 March
By Anonymous
I've never read the books (I don't WANT TO read the books), but if Bella /really/ read all the books in the library, either a) the library is ridiculously small, or b) it is filled with children literature. From what I've come to understand about Bella's mental capabilities it would take her several lifetimes just to get through the 3 little pigs.
Reply
Friday 19 March
By Liz
Surely if you're going to have an opinion about a book, you have to have actually read the book?
I'm not disagreeing with anyone if they have actually sat and read the book and come to the conclusion that.. ITS S--T.
But without reading the book you're just following the crowd of 'Twilight haters', without any basis to your opinion.
Making your opinion a waste of time, as who cares what you think about a book you've never read?
I've never read War and Piece, but i think its rubbish...
See what I mean?
Surely its better to be part of a crowd who have done something to affirm there standing?
By the way i didn't actually enjoy the Twilight Saga and think the game is brilliant, but i've read the books so i can hold that opinion can't I?
Tuesday 23 March
By Singe
@liz "Surely if you're going to have an opinion about a book, you have to have actually read the book?"
Not necessarily, no. You can have an opinion on anything regardless of how little you know about it. It might be a silly and ill-informed opinion, but you can still have one nonetheless.
But I'm being pedantic. You were asking rhetorically if one can have a valid opinion on a book they haven't read. Well sure! They can read extensively ABOUT a particular book without reading the book itself and still have a valid and informed opinion so long as what they've read about the book is reasonably accurate and/or they've read a wide variety of analysis of the book encompassing several different ranges of opinion.
Like most Christians, I've only read tiny bits of the Bible. Unlike most Christians, I find the book to be rubbish after extensive reading of writings about the Bible from a wide range of sources and opinions.
Perhaps I'm wrong, but this is what I've found to be the case.
Thursday 29 April
By Joe
@Liz
You can't even spell War and Peace correctly.
Sunday 27 June
By Jessika
Sorry, Singe, I'm with Liz on this one. I've read all four of the books, not because I enjoy it (far from it - as a student of literature and a writer myself, I think the whole thing is rubbish and, as the above game states, is a complete violation of the rule "show, don't tell" - which is there for VERY good reason! - and reads like the sad, twisted, and masochistic daydream of a 9th grader. But, I've read the books so that, when situations like this come up, not only can I give an INFORMED opinion, I can laugh along with the writer of this article about how accurate he is in saying how bad it is, and even point out the worst parts that the unread complainer isn't even aware of. Like the absolutely horrid, blatant, and poorly written black and white comparison between Edward and Jacob - night and day, cultured and pagan, hot and cold, werewolf and vampire, and he's not even a real werewolf! I'm with whoever made the comment above - if she read the entire library, it was nothing but Goosebumps and probably not even a dictionary, but a 12-year old's impression of Anne Rice's Interview with a Vampire - obviously they didn't understand most of it.
That being said...
SUCK IT, Twatlighters. Twilight is the only movie I've watched better than the book, because it has violence and nowhere near as much sparkling vampire as the book. It's a horrible, trashy romance novel for unloved teenage girls, and is purely in existence so that we can all laugh at it in another five or ten years in the next incarnation of Mystery Science Theatre 3000, which will purposely take three shows off of bad 50's scifi movies JUST to mock the series. Because Breaking Dawn will never be made into a movie, because Meyer doesn't want you to know how horrible it is. >.> Although, if they managed to get Darren Lynn Bousman to direct it, it might end up a fairly decent movie, if they can get the permission to rewrite the entire goddamned thing. It's a shame that tripe like this not only gets published, but publicised. It's a travesty, and most of you whiny fangirls wouldn't know literature if someone beat you to death with a copy of Moby Dick! Which I use purely because it's a huge tome with enough satisfying mass to do the job properly.
Wednesday 17 March
By Sally
You know what's really pathetic?
Someone who obviously hates this novel, creating a DRINKING game about it...taking so much out of their day to create a game and bash it. How the hell does that make any sense? You are actually showing a bit of obsession by going through a book to bash it and create a game about it. You should either hate it, and let the thing go. Meaning to stop talking about it.
Oh, and one other thing. The correct use of the 1st person is for the character to be telling the story. Not the author. A regular person would think/write, "Forks was literally my personal Hell on Earth."
That's how some people, many people, think when they are feeling something strong. Even if they are read so many books, they still do this.
Now...because I know what the response is going to be. "It's an opinion, I have the right for my own." I have the right for my own opinion as well, and it's this:
If you dislike the book then don't talk about it. If your friends force you to talk about it, then they are obviously not that good of friends or they need to see someone about their obsession. Get a life outside of bashing a book you hate!
Reply
Saturday 20 March
By depravedwino
welcome.to.the.internet
Wednesday 17 March
By DrDykes
It's the man's job to entertain! So what better project could he be doing?