
ComicsAlliance is live on site at Emerald City Comic-Con in Seattle, where the the big Marvel Q&A panel, "Mondo Marvel," just kicked off at the convention center with a huge roster of Marvel writers on hand: Matt Fraction, Brian Michael Bendis, Ed Brubaker, Kieron Gillen, Joe Kelly, C.B. Cebulski, Joe Kelly, Rick Remender, Jeff Parker, and Paul Tobin. Marvel Editor-in-Chief Joe Quesada began by telling the audience: "This is actually your show. You guys get to run this panel," and invited fans up to a mike at the front of the room to ask questions.
The first question came from a Spider-Man who asked, "To what degree do I have to to debase myself to get your to get Spider-Man and Mary Jane together?"
Joe Quesada: "You know what... no. We worked too hard to get Peter to this point. The marriage -- I understand why certain people want to see [it], but we have to manage the charcaters for the future, and a married Peter Parker --as cool as they may seem -- forom a writer's standpoint... it handcuffs the character."
Ed Brubaker simply handed the fan a piece of paper that said, "No. Sorry."

A soldier who had spent time in Iraq brought a copy of the controversial "Captain America" #602 "Tea Party" issue, and said to Joe Quesada, "This is a great comic. Why did you apologize for this?"
Joe Quesada: "What I had said was that we had made a mistake in identifying a protesting group as an actual existing group in America, be it Tea Baggers or anyone else. And that's really the truth, because it wasn't meant to be there... If we had put an ACORN or Moveon.org sign in there people on the other side would have been offended and that would have been just as wrong... Along with that, I did make mention [to] that the person who said we had nefarious purposes behind it... I said I think you've really gone way too far... I'd like to steer clear of [political issues] when it comes to our characters... But there are certain characters that in the nature of the character they have the political beliefs built in... In those cases those characters have to reflect what's in their nature. [But] if a writer's writing a story in which they present a belief, we always need to show the other side of the spectrum."
Ed Brubaker: "I grew up on military bases, and the first place I ever brought Captain America was at the P.O. in Gitmo. I grew up in the '70s reading Captain America comics, where Captain America and the Falcon were always talking about race relations... I don't know if we could do that today, the way the media works. For me -- I just try to write the characters the way that I've always perceived them.... I just wanted to show that the mood in the country has shifted this way. That's all I want to say. We don't have Exxon, we have Roxxon. We always keep our fictional world fictional... We don't get on a soapbox about it. And I don't think I was trying to. I tried very hard not to, and we got a lot of flak for it."

Quick quotes:
Joe Quesada on the Heroic Age: "The Heroic Age -- before it had a name it started with a manifesto... I feel like we've done a lot of big company-wide crossovers and we need to take at least a year off from them. [It seems like] we just gotta feed the beast: do another big one, and another big one, and then it becomes diminishing returns. So the challenge was to take the individual books... and see each of them as an individual franchise. The idea is that while we may not have one big tentpole event, we'll give you ten stories to choose from... It gives our talent a chance to breathe a little bit... I think eventually we'll get back on the hamster wheel and blow the doors off the industry with some big events."
Joe Quesada on the Marvel/Disney merger: "From all indications, and every dealing I've had with the folks at Disney, Marvel runs like Marvel runs. Very much the same way that Pixar is Pixar, or ESPN or ESPN. We have the ability to use the power of Disney... but our books are going to be our books and our movies are going to be our movies."
C.B. Cebulski on the future of "Runaways": "No plans right now. It's just a matter of finding the right time and the right place."
Joe Quesada on resolving story threads that came out of "One More Day": "There is a story in the works. I did promise Spider-Man fans that we would fill in the blanks."
Network: 
































Comments:
(7)Add a comment
Saturday 13 March
By Radlum
For a moment I thought that the hairy guy with the note was Ed Brubaker, I was thinking: so thatīs why he always wear a hat.
Anyway, as much as I hate OMD (to the point I boycotted ASM until the American Son arc last year), I think itīs about time people stop whining about it or complaining to Quesada about getting Peter and MJ back together, just get over it already.
Reply
Saturday 13 March
By Michael D.
Y'know, it is what it is with Pete and MJ, but un-marrying them really did nothing to improve Spidey books that couldn't have been done with them staying married. To say that marriage ties the writers' hands is to say you don't have good writers.
Reply
Sunday 14 March
By Steven R. Stahl
It is unfortunate that the panel Q&A format doesn't allow follow-up questions, so that answers such as Quesada's would deservedly be ripped to shreds. He's still making the same defective argument that he made immediately after OMD: Spider-Man stories are written for kids who think that marriage is boring, a turn-off, etc., and that writers will have problems finding interesting things to do with Parker if he's married.
How is having Parker eternally uncommitted different from making him a dramatic version, in effect, of Archie Andrews as a superhero? There's less possibility of dramatic tension in any given story if the reader knows that the illusion of change policy is in effect and that long-term relationships are impossible. Someone needs to point out to Quesada that an unchanging status quo makes any character boring, and assuming that Spider-Man fans won't realize that implies that he thinks Spider-Man fans generally are idiots.
The same principle applies to Marvel's use of retcons in OMD, "Avengers Disassembled," and other stories. If the retcon violates story logic to the extent that the story doesn't make sense, then the writer and editor have failed to fulfill their responsibilities. An absence of story logic is an objective problem that can't just be waved away without an explanation. People might differ in how they react to the absence of logic, but the absence itself generally isn't debatable.
SRS
Reply
Sunday 14 March
By Comic Book Candy
I feel like a crazy person whenever I complain about BND (or OMD as people tend to prefer in this thread), because you don't hear anyone enthusiastically praising the current work on any of the Spider-Man titles.
So when someone who considers the current ASM to be mediocre and still says to "get over it (BND)"? I lose a little sanity as I clutch my previously loved Amazing Spider-Man books, drooling and mumbling about the lost possibilities....
Reply
Sunday 14 March
By MtL
I've been enjoying the heck out of BND to be honest. It was rough at first but has only been getting better and better. Arcs like New Ways to Die and Character Assassination all the way up to the Gauntlet have made me glad I got back into ASM when I did.
As far as the marriage goes, I can't see why so many people are obsessed with it. I always figured picking up a book called "Amazing Spider-Man" was a decision based on the fact that it was about Spider-Man not Spider-Man and wife. Either way, I say keep it up Marvel, I can't wait to see what you guys come up with next.
Reply
Monday 15 March
By Mila
@MtL
Go back to Marvel, Quesada.
Reply
Tuesday 16 March
By the forgoten
yeah where is runaways
Reply