Another day, another Wizard controversy. This one is basically the sort of delicious, fatty chum that the internet loves to feed upon, as it involves both the infamously cantankerous "PvP" creator Scott Kurtz unleashing the scathing bile that seems to continually burn within him and the depressingly easy target that is Wizard Magazine.It all began when a sales manager for the Wizard conventions -- which recently started a CON WAR with New York Comic Con, to the delight of no one -- sent Kurtz an e-mail asking him to attend their upcoming conventions. And while I don't think it would have taken much to make Kurtz unleash his pent-up rage about the magazine and its tactics, the sales guy managed to cram his foot in his mouth literally within the first two words of the letter by addressing it to "Kurt," which is in no way his name.
Cue the open letter, where Kurtz responded with the humility and grace that we've come to expect by attacking the Wizard guy for failing to recognize him as "a pioneer in my field and a 'tastemaker' with a large podium," and proceeding to reenact the recent Daken vs. Punisher fight by verbally dismembering the guy and throwing him into a sewer:
Remember Mike Wieringo? Remember how you guys only cared about him when he was the "hot artist" for a window of time and then you quickly forgot his name despite the fact that he was producing some of the best work of his career on Fantastic Four with Mark Waid? And then remember how after he died you had the balls to name one of your panel rooms the Mike Wieringo room? I will eternally hate everyone associated with your company for that. For eternity. For Jack Kirby's version of Eternity where the concept is embodied as a giant man made up of the universe. That's me, hating you for the Mike Wieringo thing. Forever.
He closes the letter with a quick bro-five over how, yeah, Eliza Dushku is pretty bangable, then tells the guy to stick everything else where the sun don't shine, and he's out.
And you know, I've been very critical of many aspects of the magazine in the past -- particularly its approach to women -- but I'm starting to feel bad now, if only because Wizard magazine is not actually a giant Borg cube where everyone thinks and acts as one.
Reading this got me thinking about the time I spent at Virgin Comics, where I assure you that I was not personally responsible or even particularly happy about the Jenna Jameson comic book "Shadow Hunter," and yet had to occasionally endure lectures from men within the industry after it came out about how I was contributing to sexism in comics. (P.S. I still remember all of you!)
Similarly, while Wizard has done some pretty unfortunate and tasteless things in the past, it's a bit unfair to treat every single person who works for the magazine as though they were complicit with each and every one of those incidents, particularly when it comes to editorial and business decisions made way above their pay grade. Hell, there's no way of knowing whether sales guy was even working for the mag during the Wieringo incident, or even if he knows who Wieringo is.
If Kurtz was actively looking for a reason to unload his grievances about the magazine, then he certainly found one, but let's not pretend that crucifying an underling for the sins of Gareb Shamus isn't an unfair exercise in projection, no matter how satisfying or entertaining it may be.
Update: Somehow, I missed these tweets from a couple weeks ago, where Kurtz tells "Gereb" where to get off. By telling Twitter. Or something.
Network: 


























Comments:
(46)Add a comment
Wednesday 04 November
By C. Walker
Kurtz may have taken his anger out at the wrong salesmen, but he's right about what Wizard does to Cons. I was there in 2006 when they tried to bring down HeroesCon (something they are still working at) and the industry showed up there in support, including Warren Ellis. Wizard is fracturing this industry just like he said; trying to bleed the last bit of money out of it.
Reply
Wednesday 04 November
By TankMan
Um not that we can't tell that your really biased towards wizard butt the email Kurtz responded to had his name misspelled as well, the guy called him Kurt. All I'm saying is if you are going to print the truth as you see it print the whole truth.
Reply
Wednesday 04 November
By Kyle Maxwell
I took the comments about being a pioneer and tastemaker as at least partially in-cheek.
Reply
Wednesday 04 November
By Donny
I like that you take issue with Kurtz being "infamously cantankerous" but have no problem taking a piss all over him while completely ignoring the genuine issues he has with Wizard. Classy dude.
Reply
Wednesday 04 November
By Cameron
I'm amused that you have taken obvious over-the-top, deliberate hyperbolic overstatements written in complete sarcasm and somehow construed said words as though Kurtz was being serious. You fail at Reading Comprehension 101.
Reply
Thursday 05 November
By White667
I'm completely on Scott's side here, and I'm fairly sure that around 95% of the webcomic industry agrees with him on at least one level here.
But, what I don't understand is why you DON'T publish Wizards letter, or the entirety of Scott's letter. It's just kinda shows you don't really see Kurtz position on this at all.
Reply
Thursday 05 November
By Laura Hudson
I know you were all sent here by Kurtz, but let's try to be constructive. Tankman, I absolutely mentioned the name error in my post, and White667, I link very clearly to the full letters for people to read, which I hope everyone did because they are far more demonstrative in full.
Also, since I've made fun of Wizard pretty much professionally for the last four years, including three as the Senior Editor of a magazine founded in opposition to Wizard -- which also wrote "SUCK IT WIZARD" across the cover of its last issue -- and currently have the third Google entry for "gareb shamus" where I alternately mock the Wizard EIC and post a Halloween mask of his face, I find your accusations that I'm "really biased towards Wizard" to be a bit uninformed.
There are plenty of people who have issues with Wizard -- including people who work or have worked there -- but feeling angry doesn't mean you get to lash out at whoever is standing in front of you just because you want a Shamus whipping boy. If Kurtz had something to say to Shamus he should have said it to Shamus, rather than tweeting insults at the PvP feed and throwing stones at random employees.
Reply
Thursday 05 November
By Chris Ward
Laura, I used to work for Wizard and I was supposed to interview Jenna at one point about that comic. I quit, the Jenna thing never came to be, and I think I feel pretty good about that. Were you the one that grilled me about my background, wanted the questions in advance, changed the questions, etc? It was like they were prepping me to interview the president or something. Very guarded, that Jenna (I guess I can understand why).
Anyway, my take on the Kurtz thing is at my site, where I witnessed Scott's initial terrible encounter at Wizard World Texas.
Thursday 05 November
By Scott Kurtz
First of all, I didn't send anybody here, Laura.
please explain to me why when you link to something (like my website) you're reporting. But when I link to something (like your website) I'm attacking.
We all got blogs and we all go opinions. Why am I being judged for expressing mine on mine?
Thursday 05 November
By Laura Hudson
You linked to this post off your Twitter feed and seven people immediately showed up to ardently defend you, so yes, I do think you sent them here.
I'm not judging your for wanting to express your opinion, or even for the content of your opinion; I'm judging you because I think you went way over the line and expressed it in a way that was inappropriate and unfair.
I don't think I'm being particularly unclear about this.