Movies: Fans may not know what Bane has in store for Batman in The Dark Knight Rises, but Tom Hardy seems to have cheerfully "broken" at least one crew member while working on the film. [Blastr]
Digital: Counter to what CA was originally told, Dark Horse has "chosen to release all new single-issue comics digitally for the price of $2.99 for the first month, dropping to our standard digital pricing of $1.99 after that." [Dark Horse]
Animation: Some conservatives think movies like the Astro Boy, The Incredibles and others have overt political agendas. Is there a political party devoted to licensing merchandise or something? [THR]
Gaming: DC Comics is coming to HeroClix Online in the form of new maps and more than a dozen DC figures on December 7. [HeroClix Online]
Fresh Ink! Online: Blair Butler and guest host Jim McCann discuss Cobra, Davedevil, Infinite Horizon, FF, Ultimates, Locke & Key, Richard Stark's Parker: The Martini Edition and The Art of Tim Burton. [FIO]
Gaming: A new Thor board is now available in Marvel Pinball (which is now on almost every gaming platform). [Marvel]
The fact that Hardy did that pose goes to show he knows the characters history. Thats just awesome! Hopefully there will be a quasi back breaker move done on Batman as a nod to the comic's.
...do you know your link to the Hollywood Reporter article goes to #8 of 11 instead of the beginning?
Kind of bizarre that it plays the "Incredibles = conservative" trope without even getting into the "When everyone is super, NO ONE will be!" premise -- conservatives argue that the movie is about liberals trying to make everyone the same and not let anyone be exceptional.
I've never quite bought that interpretation. First of all, it's pretty much the premise of Harrison Bergeron, and Vonnegut was certainly no conservative. And second, the movie is hardly a gungho free-market parable -- it's pretty openly critical of private insurance companies, depicting them as more interested in turning a profit than serving the public. The hero is not the rich corporation serving its own self-interest; the hero is the cubicle drone who breaks the rules and puts other people's well-being ahead of profits. Sounds suspiciously like altruism to me.
Not that I think there's a deep political message there; The Incredibles, just like The Muppets, uses simple and recognizable tropes to demonstrate who the good guys are and who the bad guys are. Whatever deep messages it has, they're not about liberal/conservative/libertarian, they're about the importance of family and being yourself.
Now, Ghostbusters, on the other hand -- THAT movie has a clear Libertarian subtext.
I think you're right that it isn't about libertarianism precisely (great observation on the private insurance company btw), but it does deal with some of the premisses of libertarianism - that some people are better than others and to artificially help or forcibly improve those less-fortunate is wrong (through fx. public services, like fire departments and public health care), because it hurts those who are naturally abled (by diminishing profit motive) and as a consequence also hurts those who are less-fortunate (by diminishing profit motive).
Again, though, I don't think it's that exactly -- I mentioned Harrison Bergeron for a reason. It's perfectly possible to believe that there are forces holding people back from reaching their full potential without blaming it on the public sector or political correctness or whatever bogeyman you choose.
And indeed it's instructive that the heroes are the people who help the less fortunate.
(Actually, come to think of it, I wonder if the name of the protagonist in Up is a tongue-in-cheek rebuttal of the notion that Pixar is made up of a bunch of laissez-faire capitalists -- Carl Fredricksen, get it?)
5 Comments