
Dec 1st 2011 By: Caleb Goellner
'White Akira' Pours One for America's Dreaded Live Action Movie [Art]

Add a Comment
I'm sorry but people are talking about the demographics, and what will and wont sell to the American people, but why would anyone give a **** about seeing a live action remake of Akira, that wasn't true to it's origins?
I care about Akira, because the storyline still makes sense in today's world. Especially with the uncertainty of the Fukushima Nuclear Plant, and this being generation RX, not because it stars well known/hated Hollywood actors and actresses.
When production companies use these big names to sell their movies, it's usually because the script is crap, but they've been handed a golden storyline. I can't list the times I've seen a movie only to wish that they had used an unknown in the starring role.
We're all worried about the ethnicity of one character? How about the fact that they changed an entire race of people, because we can't handle the truth. I've watched the original over 20 times now, and it wasn't because the actors were a paticular race, it's because it was a compelling storyline, in a 2+ hour movie that followed a 6 volume graphic novel as well as it could. I just wish Hollywood, would learn a lesson from the story they're re-working.
For everyone saying that Asian males can't sell tickets and this is just The Market At Work, please, I'd love to see your definitive evidence for this, since it's apparently a settled point of fact.
Or, just maybe, it's this empty line you heard somewhere once that reinforces your own prejudices.
People have weird ideas of how decisions are made in the entertainment business. It's not by statisticians, that's for sure. In fact, it's often by urban legend, petty rumor, and fear of shaking up conservative trends no matter what the results might be.
I think all of those apply to the goofy rule of thumb that Asian leads can't sell tickets.
Interesting how there is plenty of "outrage" over white people cast as Akira... which by the way I whole heartily agree with, but than when someone points out certain people of other races play a certain character you are called "racist" and told to a variety of asinine things/insults.
I am not crying, I expect it, just interesting is all.
The instances you're talking about are fairly different. In the case of Thor, for instance, there was what I would consider to be a disproportionate amount of outrage, especially when compared to what we're dealing with here. One supporting character's race being change is not equivalent to what is apparently the race of the entire main cast.
December 02 2011 at 7:46 PM Report abuse Permalink +3 rate up rate down ReplyAlso to add, just re-read the first mention of this and found out Leonardo DeCaprio's production company is fielding this.
Folks, Leonardo DeCaprio has a bad rep in Asia. He doesn't really care about people or even the environment. He may not be as badly seen as Steven Seagal over there, but...
Yeah, knowing this, the casting and the re-imagining make *total sense* to me. DeCaprio has no respect for the source material. He can be pretty much "a player" in Hollywood.
So what's his bad rep based on? I did a cursory Google search on "Leonardo DiCaprio Asia" and I mostly got articles based on his desire to save tigers out there.
December 02 2011 at 4:03 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyI doubt Leonardo DiCaprio put his feet up on a desk and told everyone that Akira would be white. We'll likely never know which hacks were responsible.
December 05 2011 at 6:45 PM Report abuse Permalink +1 rate up rate down ReplyAlthough this could be a response to Josh or anyone, I am gonna have to disagree about this being "alright".
I mean, it has been done before and movies do change. There are allowances and they work.
But people are really missing the "point" here. Asian actors have always had a hard time in Hollywood and only less than a handful have gotten any real cred within the business. This has been a long-standing problem going back to the end of the silent era.
In some ways, there are good reasons to put a certain spin on a remake, but I feel it just keeps people in their own culture and not receptive to another country.
We are all "People/Men/Women". I remember watching the original Ultraman with it's all Asian cast and not caring about "race" in the least. In fact, I learned alot about Japan, another country, through that show. I grew more "worldly" and gained experience that people in another country are not that different from me. Move forward and we have "Power Rangers" coming over and being cast in a White-Bred town and not Japan.
While other countries could and do accept such movies, do we really need to? I remember when the original "La Femme Nikita" came out and many people were blown away and loved it. Sure, the american remake was good, but something was missing. It was not the same. I also remember seeing the movie, "Shall we Dance?" form Japan and it fits perfectly in the context of a straight-up salaryman, but did this carry over into the American version with Richard Gere as well? I think not.
Such castings marginalize the source country and casting. What if Africa were to remake, "To Kill a Mockingbird?" Okay, outlandish example IS outlandish but such a story does not fit well within the context of Africa; it is a story about the problems set in America.
There was a time when people embraced and chased movies from other countries, especially those movie watchers dissatisfied with the typical Hollywood system. There was a time other countries made movies of the same or better caliber than Hollywood (then, World War 2 began....). It's strange that at those earlier times, people were more accepting of leading men and just watching a movie from a foriegn country than they do seem today; entertainment is entertainment, no matter where it comes from.
That's a much longer, more thorough, and well-thought-out response than the two line "There's no problem with this" posts deserve. Kudos.
December 02 2011 at 4:00 PM Report abuse Permalink +1 rate up rate down ReplyPlease don't refer to Africa as a homogeneous blob with one film industry when you're trying to call out unconscious racism and ignorance.
December 04 2011 at 3:35 AM Report abuse Permalink +3 rate up rate down ReplyMovies are typically not true to their source material. Even the manga and anime of Akira differ. At some point you have to just let people use their artistic license and tell the story their way.
To say that this is not the Akira movie you wanted is fair, but criticizing race is getting old and hypocritical.
Remember how petty the Heimdall fiasco was? Prince of Persia without any Persians? Last time I checked Ras al Ghul was Arabian and Bane has a Spanish origin. Should we crucify Chris Nolan?
The list can go on. Why? Because casting is based on audience demographics. White male leads do better in the box office. This can still be a great movie in the spirit of Akira, but not a direct translation. Otherwise we need to get pissed that the movie isn't in Japanese with subtitles too.
Up Next: The Earthwashing of Dejah Thoris in John Carter of Mars.
How funny would it be if it were actually called "White Akira" ?
"Whiiiitte Tetsuuuuooooooo!!!!!!!"
WHITE KANEDAAAAAAAAAAAA
December 02 2011 at 4:01 PM Report abuse Permalink +4 rate up rate down ReplyDear clueless ones, this movie is:
Star Wars without being set in space.
Buffy starring a ripped dude nicknamed Buff.
Doctor Who without a TARDIS who prefers cheeseburgers to jammy dodgers.
Shaft starring Don Knotts and being about a crime in an elevator.
Batman being set in Topeka, wearing a baseball jersey, and driving around solving farm crimes in his Chevy van.
I'd watch the "Buffy" one. That sounds hilarious.
December 02 2011 at 10:00 AM Report abuse Permalink +4 rate up rate down ReplyHis best friends would be "Willy" and "Xandria"
December 02 2011 at 12:44 PM Report abuse Permalink +2 rate up rate downWow...I'd totally would watch Don Knotts solving elevator crime!
(Unfortunately, he died, so that'd be *quite* the achievement! But that movie would've been up my alley!)
....Akira didn't take place in 1980s Tokyo...-_-, Akira Takes place in 2019 Tokyo.
December 01 2011 at 9:01 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyJust curious - everyone hyperventilating over the "whitewashing" of Akira, were you as offended by the American remakes of movies like The Ring, The Grudge, One Missed Call, etc? Are you as offended by the American remake of The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo, a movie based on a Swedish novel that seems to in fact star no Swedes in major roles? There have been SCORES of foreign books & films adapted for American audiences - why is it anime/manga need to remain so true to the source, in terms of the race of the characters?
December 01 2011 at 8:04 PM Report abuse Permalink -6 rate up rate down Replyalthough I am upset about the race of the characters, I am more upset that the entire story is beginning to change. No bike gang? and the two are brothers now? it just ruins the whole thing
December 01 2011 at 9:07 PM Report abuse Permalink +1 rate up rate down ReplyHow does that ruin anything? It makes it a different movie. Oldboy changed the source material immensely, but it's heralded as an amazing film. The same can be said for The Departed, which changed much of the movie it was based on (Infernal Affairs.) Sometimes changing characters or their motivations can turn out for the better. Would you REALLY want a frame by frame remake of a movie you've already seen? No thanks.
I'm not saying that this movie isn't going to suck; just that I think complaining about "whitewashing" the cast or changing plot elements is not going to be the reason why.
@Jeff: It's going to be *A* reason why.
Protip: white New Yorkers are not typically named "Tetsuo" and "Kaneda".
If the American version of The Ring had starred a white girl inexplicably named Sadako, then yes, it would have been effing distracting.
Umm who said that people do not get upset by that? I know me and all my friends do. The United States (not "America" because there are 2 continents with America in the title, both of which have more than 1 country fyi) and all countries do that, they mold movies to fit their culture. The real issue is that they do not change the name or say it's a remake, they should not claim the original title if they are going to change the story soo much. If I like a story I watch it in it's original form, from the country it was created in and in it's original language. Its not that only anime/manga need to stay true to its original form its that they are stating the movie is Akira, which is clearly is not. I cannot speak for everyone but that is my take on it. I think that the US tends to center white people and remake movies in an image that the high end producers want and demand.
December 01 2011 at 9:42 PM Report abuse Permalink +8 rate up rate down ReplyFollow Us
Most Popular Posts
Features

The 11 Best Comics of 2011
A countdown of the must-read books of the year.



























68 Comments