For people not in the know, there's been a bit of an online gold rush the past few days as, likely due to a major data mix-up, tons (literally, most likely!) of incredibly expensive trades and hardcovers distributed by Diamond Comics Distributors were accidentally repriced in Amazon's system (at list price, as opposed to discount price) at the paltry sum of $14.99. Some of them even got repriced down to about eight bucks later as a result of the surge in demand that shot the books to the top of the bestseller list and triggered Amazon's automatic-discount-for-bestsellers code.

Now, Rich Johnston would tell you this:
"But if there is a lesson here, it's this. Comics are too expensive, You make them cheaper, much cheaper, and people will buy them. Buy lots of them. Buy them more than anything on Amazon."Now, I don't get his logic here at all. If you make comics cheaper, people will buy them: Well, yes, that's obvious. More people will buy anything if it's cheaper, for the most part. Comics are an entertainment medium; they're an elastic good, and like most luxury items people will buy more if they are cheaper. This is basic high school economics.
Extrapolating from this that "comics are too expensive", though? That is, as Chris Butcher said, "utterly stupid."
The items we're talking about here that everyone jumped on -- the big, 400+-page omnibus editions that sometimes sell for above a solid hundo -- are expensive. Of COURSE they're expensive, they're oversized luxury items. Nobody's going to read "Madman Gargantua" on a train, or to experience it for the first time; these are largely items for people who are already fans of these stories, with the exceptions of things like the Brubaker "Captain America" omnibus, which was already a pretty affordable way to grab the first two and a half years or so of that run. So, no, these omnibuses aren't too expensive. The fact that they're expensive is the point.
Rich then defends himself with a point about the $3.99 Marvel price point in the Direct Market and -- what does that have to do with a rush on Amazon for expensive luxury editions? I'm willing to bet that a ton of the people who jumped on this deal didn't get these omnibuses because they were already planning to get them or wanted to read the stories, a lot of them maybe already had them in single issues or trades and wouldn't normally consider upgrading but why not get the big, awesome luxury edition for fifteen bucks?
And what about the scores of people buying 60-70 copies to flip on eBay? If even just these omnibuses were set at $15 regularly, we wouldn't see those sales occur because immediately flipping them would be pointless. For a LOT of buyers, even, I imagine the need for immediacy in purchasing was the fear of the hammer coming down and the prices going back to normal. If omnibuses were just $15 all the time, I doubt we'd see the ticket-onsale purchasing mentality that was on display here that rocketed these books to the top of the Amazon bestsellers list.
And none of these points are even remotely applicable to the DM, where the fact that the $1 first issue of Grant Morrison and Sean Murphy's spectacular "Joe the Barbarian" only sold 25,000 copies -- and only lost about 4,000 (rough estimate) of them with the $2.99 second issue, judging by the change in index in February's charts -- points to a market where new characters and concepts have a hard time breaking in no matter what the price. Marvel's $3.99 comics (almost all of which are either AA-list titles or niche miniseries, not new characters/concepts they're trying to push) are doing just fine as well in the marketplace.As Butcher said, there's still a discussion to be had over the price of comics. One article Johnston links to in the comments to Butcher's post compares the price increase in comics to the price increase in other entertainment media, and that's interesting information -- but even that's a flawed comparison since many $3.99 titles make up for the extra price with extra content, especially all of DC's and quite a few of Marvel's ("Incredible Hulk", "Captain America").
The problems with the Direct Market are incredibly complex and not easily reduced to "shit is too expensive," no matter how hard you try. With the recent increases in Diamond's minimum order amount -- which now requires that orders of new products reach $2,500 -- the DM is no longer the egalitarian utopia that allowed for the independent comics boom. It largely exists to proliferate weekly comics to a worldwide group of specialty shops. And if there's anything this debacle HAS shown us, it's that they certainly aren't ready for prime time when it comes to anything beyond that, since they evidently can't construct a data file properly without losing tons of parties likely hundreds of thousands of dollars -- but that's it.
Edit: Since I wrote this post, Johnston posted with details and instructions on how to harass and harangue Amazon representatives about not getting your obviously hideously underpriced comics for free, because some people are getting $30 consolation gift certificates. Here's all I have to say on this matter: if your time is worth enough that the ten minutes you spent ordering comics cost you $30, then you probably aren't that concerned about losing some expensive comics you can already afford. If it isn't worth that much, then you're just an opportunistic leech.
Network: 
































Comments:
(22)Add a comment
Wednesday 10 March
By Pete
How dare you make a reasoned and rational assessment! We expect reactionary and short-sighted behavior!
Seriously, though, great article.
Reply
Wednesday 10 March
By tommyhood.designs
Uh Nice article and While I agree that these omnibuses were bought to be flipped, and bought fast due to the "hammer coming down" COMICS ARE TOO EXPENSIVE!!!
True the quality of them is better than ever, BUT the ads are more prevalent than ever... and They are padded with filler. I read a Batman and Robin the other day that was 17 pages of story, and 12 pages of ads, and previews of other comics... not a good value.
I feel $2.99 is a fair price, but the $3.99 price point HAS driven me to buy less. Your "Joe the Barbarian" example falls a little flat due to it's niche, a lot of Superhero geeks aren't gonna buy into a story they know nothing about. I heard great things about the book, but now will wait for the trade...OR BETTER YET... DRUMROLL PLEASE.... (NO NOT DOWNLOADING, I hate reading comics on a screen)
THE LIBRARY!!!! I recently discovered the library has TONS of Comics, and have cut my spending even more from my local shop...
Comics are overpriced by about $1... no question
Reply
Wednesday 10 March
By Reuben Flagg
So did anybody who ordered actually get these books at the low glitch price? My order was canceled yesterday. I was bummed at first, but really the $25 gift certificate is enough for me.
Reply
Wednesday 10 March
By Tyler Chin-Tanner
Great piece of writing, David. Well thought out and supported.
Reply
Wednesday 10 March
By Aaron Poehler
As usual, Rich Johnston is talking out of his ass, making blanket statements with absolutely nothing to back them up, and failing to accept responsibility for any damage resulting from his shoddy 'journalism'. What else is new?
Reply
Wednesday 10 March
By Tom from West Chester
I realize there's more to the article than just one line and it comes across as nitpicky to do this, but, well, the article is in response to just one line from Rich Johnston so I don't feel it's out of place to ask for further elaboration on the following line:
"And none of these points are even remotely applicable to the DM, where the fact that the $1 first issue of Grant Morrison and Sean Murphy's spectacular "Joe the Barbarian" only sold 25,000 copies -- and only lost about 4,000 (rough estimate) of them with the $2.99 second issue, judging by the change in index in February's charts -- points to a market where new characters and concepts have a hard time breaking in no matter what the price."
I don't think this example is the best one- Joe the Barbarian is a mini from Vertigo, which is an imprint that sells vastly more copies of their product in trade than in single issues. I know it's anecdotal, but I'm far from alone in saying that I won't buy single issues for Vertigo minis, whether based on a new or established property. I tradewait. I think there is probably a better comparison to use to support your argument.
Reply
Wednesday 10 March
By Tyler Chin-Tanner
That's funny. I thought it was the perfect example. It was used to argue against the point that comics need to slash prices to drive sales. Here we have an example where a comic priced at a third of the regular price barely sold more than the follow up issue at $2.99.
Saying that most people wait for the trade on this one really just supports that same point that people will buy the higher ticketed item if it's what they want, and not the cheaper comic just because it's cheaper. So I'm not really sure what kind of example you wanted.
Wednesday 10 March
By Christian
THANK YOU.
I've been saying this ever since I read Dick Johnson's article. And I love the part about hassling Amazon for an extra $30. Next week he'll make a post on how to properly fall down in public places so that you can sue them.
Reply
Wednesday 10 March
By Zodcomplex
Thanks for this. It's nice to see someone taking the wind out of that enormous blowhard's sails. I wonder if he'll have time to read this between teaching people how to abuse the welfare system & giving Mark Millar handies in the men's room?
Reply
Wednesday 10 March
By Victoria
I do think that individual comics are reasonably priced. However, there are a few omnibuses that I'd like to get but can't afford. And I want the omnibuses because I got into some comic series later in the series, and I'd like to go back and read what happened before I started reading them. I'm certainly not going to go back and by every single issue of a comic series if I came in after, say 40-50 issues in. But cheap omnibuses would allow me to catch up, and I'd be more likely to continue reading the series.
Reply